Health Experts Poke Holes On Smoke-Free Alternatives’ Raging Debate

Leading health experts have condemned Public Health Principal Secretary Mary Muthoni for her “unfounded and misleading” statements regarding smoke-free alternatives to traditional cigarettes.

Muthoni’s remarks, which highlighted the “dire health implications” of vaping and nicotine pouches, lacked scientific backing and come as Parliament considers new legislation on these products.

Dr. Michael Kariuki, Secretary General of the Harm Reduction Society of Kenya (HRS), criticized Muthoni’s comments, stating, “The Principal Secretary’s remarks ignore global scientific consensus and risk discouraging smokers from adopting safer alternatives that could save their lives. This approach will harm public health and delay progress in reducing smoking-related deaths.”

HRS emphasized that smoke-free nicotine products, including vapes and nicotine pouches, are significantly less harmful than combustible cigarettes and have helped millions worldwide quit smoking.

The World Health Organization (WHO) supports this view, noting that nicotine itself does not cause cancer and is included in its list of essential medicines as part of nicotine replacement therapies like patches and gums.

“Scientific evidence shows that most tobacco-related harm is caused by burning, and non-combustible nicotine products can dramatically reduce that harm,” Dr. Kariuki added.

He urged Kenya to adopt these safer alternatives, following the successful examples of countries like Sweden, the UK, and New Zealand, rather than opposing them without scientific justification.

The HRS called on lawmakers to prioritize evidence-based regulations that ensure the safety and accessibility of these alternatives for adult smokers while promoting their role in harm reduction.

“We need policies that empower smokers to make healthier choices rather than perpetuating fear and misinformation,” Dr. Kariuki emphasized.

Additionally, HRS urged the Ministry of Health to collaborate with public health experts, researchers, and stakeholders to develop science-based policies.

“Rejecting harm reduction strategies at this critical time condemns many smokers to preventable suffering and death,” Dr. Kariuki warned.

“We stand ready to work with the government to develop pragmatic solutions that prioritize saving lives.”